tayachamp.blogg.se

Gawker vs hulk hogan
Gawker vs hulk hogan






gawker vs hulk hogan gawker vs hulk hogan

Bollea filed suit against defendants, asserting a number of claims including invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion, publication of private facts, violation of the Florida common law right of publicity, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress and copyright infringement, and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. Defendants allegedly have refused numerous requests from Bollea to remove the excerpts from the site. Defendants obtained a copy of the sex tape and posted excerpts of it on their website without Bollea’s permission. The district court denied his motion.Īccording to Bollea, six years prior to this case, he engaged in consensual sexual relations with a woman who was not his wife and the encounter was videotaped, allegedly unbeknownst to plaintiff. Plaintiff Terry Gene Bollea, known professionally as the wrestler Hulk Hogan, sought a preliminary injunction against defendants Gawker Media and related entities, requiring defendants to remove excerpts from a sex tape of Bollea and a woman not his wife that defendants posted on on or about October 4, 2012, and to prevent defendants from posting any portion of the sex tape on any other website. District court denies motion for preliminary injunction by Hulk Hogan to compel removal of sex tape from website and to prevent tape from being posted on other websites, finding that tape was a matter of public concern protected by the First Amendment.








Gawker vs hulk hogan